Dr.Jart+ Cicapair Color Corrector New Formula vs Old: 324 Reviews
THE BEAUTY READ / FIND YOUR FIT
The decision, simplified.
Dr.Jart+ relaunched its green-to-beige Cicapair color corrector in 2025. We read 324 Sephora reviews of the new and original formulas side by side.
Published · Listings checked October 20, 2026
THE BEAUTY READ · REVIEW ANALYSIS
We read 324 customer reviews before writing this.
Sephora · October 20, 2026 · Patterns counted by us from customer reviews · no review text reproduced · Amazon reviews not used
| Retailer | Reviews read | Which ones | Read on |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sephora · New formula | 114 | every English review without Sephora's Incentivized flag, all star levels and sizes (Jun 25, 2025 to Oct 19, 2026); 774 of the 889 English reviews carry the flag and 1 is from a Sephora employee, all set aside | October 20, 2026 |
| Sephora · Original formula | 210 | the 210 newest English reviews without the Incentivized flag on the original Tiger Grass page, which Sephora no longer sells (Sep 17, 2024 to Jan 2, 2026); 21 flagged reviews in that window set aside | October 20, 2026 |
Where we read, how many and when
| Retailer | Sephora · New formula | Sephora · Original formula |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews read | 114 | 210 |
| Which ones | every English review without Sephora's Incentivized flag, all star levels and sizes (Jun 25, 2025 to Oct 19, 2026); 774 of the 889 English reviews carry the flag and 1 is from a Sephora employee, all set aside | the 210 newest English reviews without the Incentivized flag on the original Tiger Grass page, which Sephora no longer sells (Sep 17, 2024 to Jan 2, 2026); 21 flagged reviews in that window set aside |
| Read on | October 20, 2026 | October 20, 2026 |
How we sorted them: Sephora skin-type and skin-tone tags; what was praised: redness correction, wearing it instead of foundation, finish, feel; what was complained about: cast or shade, patchiness, heaviness, smell, breakouts, irritation, and the formula change; whether the reviewer says they used the original formula; how long it lasts on the skin, when the reviewer says; whether a repurchase was mentioned; star level kept for context only.
Left out of the count: reviews carrying Sephora's Incentivized flag (free sample), set aside by the flag without reading; reviews from Sephora employees; reviews whose text says the product was received free or for a review; reviews by people who had not used the product they reviewed, or about shipping or a different product; reviews not in English, with no text, or written about someone else's skin (9 free product mentioned in the text, 7 not about the product, not used, or no usable detail, 2 not in English, 1 no text, 1 bought for someone else).
Skin types tagged on the 304 usable Sephora reviews: combination (135 reviews, the largest group); dry (49); normal (32); oily (27)
WHO SHOULD SKIP IT
- You loved the original Tiger Grass formula. 29 of 102 new-formula reviewers say they used the original, and all 29 say the new one is worse; 15% describe an unpleasant smell.
- Your skin is light-medium or deeper and you want it alone. A shade or cast problem is a bit more common with those Sephora tone tags (9 of 33, 27%, vs 21% with lighter tags), and Dr.Jart+ pitches it at lighter skin tones; check the shade first.
- You dislike a heavy or greasy feel. 19% of new-formula reviewers call it heavy, thick or greasy, against 11% for the original.
MOST OFTEN PRAISED
- Corrects or covers redness Original 56%; new 42% — 56% among new-formula reviewers who don't say they used the original
- Wears it instead of foundation Original 22%; new 16% — a no-makeup look on its own
- Bought again or a staple Original 17%; new 12% — repurchases or a long-time staple, in the reviewer's own words
- Fine on sensitive or rosacea skin Original 13%; new 11% — a reviewer's own description of their skin
MOST COMMON COMPLAINTS
- Formula changed for the worse New 31% — 29 of 102 say they used the original, and all 29 prefer it
- Cast, wrong shade or orange Original 24%; new 16% — white, gray or green cast, too light for medium or deeper skin, or orange on very fair skin
- Heavy, thick or greasy New 19%; original 11% — the new formula's bullets call it creamier
- Unpleasant smell New 15%; original 2% — 14 of the new formula's 15 are from 2026; Sephora calls it fragrance-free
Where reviews split: The new formula splits by history: 41 of the 73 reviewers who don't say they used the original (56%) say it corrects redness, while the 29 who say they used the original all say it is worse.
Where reviews split: Shade splits the original: 19 of 33 reviewers with a light-medium or deeper Sephora tone tag praise the redness correction, and 9 of the 33 name a shade problem such as a cast or a color too light for them.
How reviewers used it: Sephora's directions: apply to clean, moisturized skin, warm a small amount between the hands, press and blend until the green turns beige, and build as needed, alone or as a base before foundation. Twenty-one new-formula reviewers (21%) and 52 original reviewers (26%) say they wear it alone, under foundation or both.
Feel, per reviewers: New formula (19% call it heavy, thick, greasy or sticky); Original formula (20% say it went patchy, pilled or clung to dry patches) · Scent: Sephora's description calls the new formula fragrance-free and its inactive ingredient list shows no fragrance, though a callout says less than one percent synthetic fragrance; new-formula reviewers who dislike the smell often call it musty or like wet laundry. Reviewers who mention scent: 31 (11 liked it, 20 did not) · How long it lasts (7 reviews say): all day 2 (Original: still on at the end of the day); about 8 hours 1 (New: lasts about 8 hours); by the end of the day 2 (New: melts by the end of the day or is gone before 6 hours); after about an hour 2 (Original: crusty or cakey after about an hour (1 on oily skin))
Shares are from the reviews we read, not from every review on each site. Reviews describe other people’s skin, not yours.
MAKEUP · COMPARISON
Never tried the original: the new formula; 56% of reviewers who don't say they used the original say it fixes redness. Loved the original: get its travel size.
Dr.Jart+ Cicapair Color Correcting Treatment SPF 30, new vs original formula | 324 unflagged Sephora customer reviews read, October 20, 2026 · one ingredient list read · Listings checked October 20, 2026 · Built from customer reviews
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. Links marked “paid link” go to Amazon and may earn us a commission at no extra cost to you. Offers and sellers can change.
Choose your starting point
Dr.Jart+ Cicapair Soothing Color Correcting Treatment SPF 30 (new formula)
THE ONE SEPHORA SELLS NOW
The 2025 relaunch: still corrects red for many, but 3 in 10 miss the old one.
You never used the original and want a tinted SPF 30 step for redness.
The trade-off31% say the formula got worse, 19% call it greasy and 15% dislike the smell.
Sold by Amazon.com at our check · October 20, 2026
Dr.Jart+ Cicapair Tiger Grass Color Correcting Treatment SPF 30 (original formula, 0.5 oz)
FOR ORIGINAL FANS
The Tiger Grass original: more reviewers say it hides redness, if you can still find it.
You loved the original and want it while the travel size is in stock.
The trade-off20% say it went patchy and 24% name a cast or shade problem.
Sold by Amazon.com at our check · October 20, 2026
Find the fit for your routine.
A quick editorial read before the deeper review: start with your main concern, then check the evidence, routine fit and trade-offs below.
Quick verdict
Never tried the original: the new formula; 56% of reviewers who don't say they used the original say it fixes redness. Loved the original: get its travel size.
Best for
Fair to light skin with visible redness that wants a tinted, SPF 30 step instead of foundation, or under it.
Trade-off
The shade is pitched at lighter skin: 16% of new and 24% of original reviewers name a cast or shade problem, and the new one runs heavier.
Think twice
You loved the original: all 29 new-formula reviewers who say they used it say the new one is worse, and 15% describe an unpleasant smell.
If you never used the original, the new formula is the one Sephora sells, and 56% of reviewers who don't say they used the original say it corrects their redness. If you did, the original travel size on Amazon is the safer buy.
THE COMPARISON / RESEARCH-LED
Side by side, without the noise.
Compare each option’s role and limitations before deciding what belongs in your routine.
The exact options we link: formula, size and seller
Same product name, two formulas. Size and description follow the Amazon and Sephora pages; the review counts above are ours.
| Product / Amazon link | Pick it for | Formula · size | Choose it if | Watch out for | Option we link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dr.Jart+ Cicapair Soothing Color Correcting Treatment SPF 30 (new formula) View on Amazon · paid link ↗ | The one Sephora sells now | New formula, creamier, semi-matte 1.85 fl oz full size | You never used the original and want a tinted SPF 30 step for redness. | 31% say the formula got worse, 19% call it greasy and 15% dislike the smell. | This link opens the new formula, 1.85 fl oz full size; the original formula and a travel size share the listing, so check the style before you buy. Seller at our check: Amazon.com |
| Dr.Jart+ Cicapair Tiger Grass Color Correcting Treatment SPF 30 (original formula, 0.5 oz) View on Amazon · paid link ↗ | For original fans | Original Tiger Grass formula 0.5 fl oz travel size | You loved the original and want it while the travel size is in stock. | 20% say it went patchy and 24% name a cast or shade problem. | This link opens the original formula in the 0.5 fl oz travel size, the only original size in stock at our check; the 1.69 fl oz original was unavailable. Seller at our check: Amazon.com |
Formula, size and the exact Amazon option · Links checked October 20, 2026
| Product / Amazon link | Dr.Jart+ Cicapair Soothing Color Correcting Treatment SPF 30 (new formula) | Dr.Jart+ Cicapair Tiger Grass Color Correcting Treatment SPF 30 (original formula, 0.5 oz) |
|---|---|---|
| Pick it for | The one Sephora sells now | For original fans |
| Formula · size | New formula, creamier, semi-matte 1.85 fl oz full size | Original Tiger Grass formula 0.5 fl oz travel size |
| Choose it if | You never used the original and want a tinted SPF 30 step for redness. | You loved the original and want it while the travel size is in stock. |
| Watch out for | 31% say the formula got worse, 19% call it greasy and 15% dislike the smell. | 20% say it went patchy and 24% name a cast or shade problem. |
| Option we link | This link opens the new formula, 1.85 fl oz full size; the original formula and a travel size share the listing, so check the style before you buy. Seller at our check: Amazon.com | This link opens the original formula in the 0.5 fl oz travel size, the only original size in stock at our check; the 1.69 fl oz original was unavailable. Seller at our check: Amazon.com |
| View on Amazon ↗ (paid link) | View on Amazon ↗ (paid link) |
What changes from one option to the next?
Use this as the fast filter. The full review below explains the evidence, texture, routine fit and trade-offs behind the recommendation.
Fair to light skin with visible redness that wants a tinted, SPF 30 step instead of foundation, or under it.
A green-to-beige color-correcting cream with mineral SPF 30; the new formula is described as creamier, the original as the Tiger Grass version
Make sure it fits the routine you already have.
The most useful product is not the one with the loudest ingredient story. It is the one you can use consistently without creating unnecessary overlap.
Review-based guide: we read 324 customer reviews on Sephora (October 20, 2026) and tallied the patterns ourselves. No review text is reproduced, Amazon reviews are not used; results are patterns counted from customer reviews, and product facts come from retailer pages.
It corrects redness in one step: 56% of original reviewers and 42% of new-formula reviewers say so, and 16-22% wear it instead of foundation.
The shade is pitched at lighter skin: 16% of new and 24% of original reviewers name a cast or shade problem, and the new one runs heavier.
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. Product links marked “paid link” earn us a small commission at no extra cost to you. Commissions never decide which product we recommend. Offers and sellers change, so check the formula style, size and seller on the product page before you buy.
Review-analysis guide: 324 customer reviews read on Sephora (October 20, 2026), sorted and counted by us; product details from brand and retailer pages checked October 20, 2026. We paraphrase patterns and never copy reviews. Results are patterns that customers described and we counted.
By The Beauty Read · Checked October 20, 2026 · AI-assisted research and editing · Contains Amazon affiliate links
The new Dr Jart Cicapair color corrector still works for many buyers, but fewer reviewers praise it than the original. Across 304 usable Sephora reviews, 42% of new-formula reviewers say it corrects or covers redness, against 56% for the original Tiger Grass formula (paid link). Thirty-one percent of new-formula reviewers say the formula changed for the worse, 19% call it heavy or greasy and 15% describe an unpleasant smell.
Is the new Dr Jart Cicapair color corrector as good as the original?
Not for the people who loved the original. Dr.Jart+ relaunched its green color corrector, the Cicapair Soothing Color Correcting Treatment SPF 30 (paid link), in 2025 with more Centella asiatica extracts and a creamier texture. Across 304 usable Sephora reviews, 42% of new-formula reviewers say the Dr Jart Cicapair color corrector corrects or covers redness, against 56% for the original Tiger Grass formula, and 31% of new-formula reviewers say the formula changed for the worse. [A1] [R-SEP-NEW] [R-SEP-OLD]
Reviewers who don't say they used the original are kinder: 41 of those 73 (56%) say the new one corrects their redness, the same share as the original's reviewers. The 29 who say they used the original all say the new one is worse. [R-SEP-NEW]
Both options we link were sold by Amazon.com at our check and sit in its Luxury Beauty store: the new formula in the 1.85 fl oz full size, and the original formula in the 0.5 fl oz travel size, the only original size in stock. [A1] [A2]
How we read 324 Sephora reviews of two formulas
Sephora now sells only the new formula, but the original's review feed is still online. Sephora marks reviews written for a free sample with an Incentivized flag: 774 of the new formula's 889 English reviews carry it, and 21 of the original's newest 231. We set the flagged reviews aside by the flag and read the rest, apart from 1 Sephora employee review: all 114 for the new formula and the 210 newest for the original. [R-SEP-NEW] [R-SEP-OLD]
We dropped 20 more: 9 that say the product was free, 7 that are not about the product, from someone who had not used it or with no usable detail, 2 not in English, 1 with no text and 1 bought for someone else. That leaves 304 usable reviews: 102 for the new formula (June 2025 to October 2026) and 202 for the original (September 2024 to December 2025). [R-SEP-NEW] [R-SEP-OLD]
Two limits matter. The two sets cover different, partly overlapping windows (new formula June 2025 to October 2026, original September 2024 to December 2025), and the original's are its last reviews on Sephora. And 87% of the new formula's English reviews carry the free-sample flag, so its unflagged set is small. [R-SEP-NEW] [R-SEP-OLD]
Dr Jart Cicapair new formula review: redness, smell and texture
The new formula is a green cream that turns beige as you blend it, with zinc oxide mineral sunscreen, a Cica Complex of Centella asiatica extracts and allantoin. Sephora sells it in 1.85 oz and 0.5 oz sizes. Its description calls it fragrance-free and its inactive ingredient list shows no fragrance, though a callout on the same page says it contains less than one percent synthetic fragrance. Amazon's listing pitches it at lighter skin tones, with a natural semi-matte finish. [S1] [A1]
Forty-three of 102 usable reviewers (42%) say it corrects or covers their redness, 16 (16%) wear it instead of foundation and 12 (12%) call it a staple. Eleven (11%) say it suits their sensitive or rosacea-prone skin, and 11 like the SPF. [R-SEP-NEW]
Complaints cluster around the change. Thirty-two (31%) say the formula got worse, 20 (20%) find the correction too weak, 19 (19%) call it heavy, thick or greasy, and 15 (15%) describe an unpleasant smell, often musty or like wet laundry, 14 of them in 2026 reviews. Sixteen (16%) name a cast or shade problem, 10 (10%) say it went patchy and 7 report breakouts. [R-SEP-NEW]
Reviews have soured over time. Of the 41 usable reviews from 2025, 22 praise the redness correction and 7 complain about the change; of the 61 from 2026, 21 praise it and 25 complain about the change. [R-SEP-NEW]
See Dr.Jart+ Cicapair Soothing Color Correcting Treatment SPF 30 (new formula) on Amazon (paid link) · This link opens the new formula, 1.85 fl oz full size; the original formula and a travel size share the listing, so check the style before you buy.
The original Tiger Grass formula: why fans still want it
Sephora no longer sells the original Cicapair Tiger Grass Color Correcting Treatment SPF 30, but Amazon still sells it in a 0.5 fl oz travel size. Its listing says it neutralizes redness in light skin tones and can be worn alone or as a primer under foundation. [A2] [R-SEP-OLD]
Its reviews are the stronger set. One hundred thirteen of 202 (56%) say it corrects or covers redness, 45 (22%) wear it instead of foundation and 34 (17%) call it a staple or have bought it again. Twenty-seven (13%) say it suits sensitive or rosacea-prone skin, and 25 (12%) like its natural finish. [R-SEP-OLD]
Texture and shade are its weak spots. Forty (20%) say it went patchy, pilled or clung to dry patches, 48 (24%) name a cast or shade problem, 23 (11%) call it heavy or greasy and 17 (8%) report breakouts. Only 5 (2%) complain about the smell. [R-SEP-OLD]
Our link opens the travel size, the only original size in stock at our check; the 1.69 fl oz original was unavailable. The new formula and a set share the listing, so check the style before you buy. [A2]
See Dr.Jart+ Cicapair Tiger Grass Color Correcting Treatment SPF 30 (original formula, 0.5 oz) on Amazon (paid link) · This link opens the original formula in the 0.5 fl oz travel size, the only original size in stock at our check; the 1.69 fl oz original was unavailable.
Does Cicapair work on medium or deeper skin?
Dr.Jart+ pitches both formulas at lighter skin tones, and the shade complaints follow that. Among original reviewers with a fair, fair-light or light Sephora tone tag, 26 of 121 (21%) name a shade problem, and 9 original reviewers in all found it orange or yellow. [A1] [A2] [R-SEP-OLD]
With a light-medium or deeper tag, a shade problem is a bit more common: 9 of 33 (27%), yet 19 of the 33 (58%) still praise the redness correction, about the same share as lighter tags. Five new-formula reviewers say it does not suit medium or deeper skin. If your skin is light-medium or deeper, check the shade before relying on it alone. A Korean color corrector this green is made to cancel redness, not to match deeper skin. [R-SEP-OLD] [R-SEP-NEW]
What it feels like, according to the reviews
Texture is where the two formulas trade complaints. Nineteen percent of new-formula reviewers call it heavy, thick or greasy, against 11% for the original; 20% of original reviewers say it went patchy or pilled, against 10% for the new one. Fifteen original reviewers (7%) found it drying. [R-SEP-NEW] [R-SEP-OLD]
Thirty-one usable reviews give a verdict on the smell: 11 like it and 20 do not, 15 of those 20 about the new formula. Only 7, the few who name a time, say how long it lasts: 2 say the original lasts all day, 1 says the new one lasts about 8 hours, 2 say the new one melts by the end of the day or is gone before 6 hours, and 2 say the original turned crusty or cakey after about an hour. [R-SEP-NEW] [R-SEP-OLD]
Sephora's directions: apply to clean, moisturized skin, warm a small amount between the hands, then press and blend until the green turns beige, building as needed. Twenty-one percent of new-formula reviewers and 26% of original reviewers wear it alone, under foundation or both. [S1] [R-SEP-NEW] [R-SEP-OLD]
Which one to buy, and when to skip it
If you have never used a Dr Jart Cicapair color corrector, start with the new formula: it is the one Sephora sells, and 56% of its reviewers who don't say they used the original say it corrects their redness. If you loved the original, buy its travel size while Amazon has it, since all 29 reviewers who say they used it prefer it. [R-SEP-NEW] [R-SEP-OLD] [A2]
Check the shade before wearing either one alone if your skin is light-medium or deeper. Skip the new formula if smells bother you or you dislike a heavy feel: 15% describe an unpleasant smell and 19% call it heavy, thick or greasy. And if your skin is dry or flaky, moisturize first, since the original's top complaint (20%) is going patchy, pilling or clinging to dry patches. [R-SEP-NEW] [R-SEP-OLD] [S1]
Keep reading
- Dr.Jart+ Ceramidin vs Cicapair vs Vital Hydra: 430 Sephora reviews
- Korean concealers compared: 1,072 reviews
- Korean cushion foundation finishes, compared
- Reading K-beauty reviews? Check these three things first
Frequently asked questions
Did Dr.Jart+ change the Cicapair color corrector formula?
Yes. Dr.Jart+ relaunched it in 2025 as the Cicapair Soothing Color Correcting Treatment SPF 30, with more Centella asiatica extracts and a creamier texture. Sephora now sells only the new formula; the original Tiger Grass formula is still on Amazon in a 0.5 fl oz travel size at our check.
Is the new Cicapair formula worse?
For reviewers who say they used the original, yes: all 29 of them, in our set of 102 usable new-formula reviews, say the new one is worse. Reviewers who don't say they used the original are happier, with 56% saying it corrects their redness.
Why does the new Cicapair smell bad?
We cannot say why. Sephora's description calls the new formula fragrance-free and its inactive ingredient list shows no fragrance, though a callout on the same page says it contains less than one percent synthetic fragrance. Fifteen of 102 usable reviewers (15%) describe an unpleasant smell, often musty or like wet laundry, 14 of them in 2026 reviews.
Can you wear Dr.Jart+ Cicapair without foundation?
Many reviewers do: 22% of original reviewers and 16% of new-formula reviewers wear it instead of foundation. It is a color-correcting tint with mineral SPF 30, so it evens redness rather than covering spots. As a color corrector for redness, it is meant to cancel pink tones rather than hide blemishes.
Does Cicapair color corrector work on darker skin?
Dr.Jart+ pitches it at lighter skin tones. Among original reviewers with a light-medium or deeper Sephora tone tag, 9 of 33 name a shade problem, though 19 of the 33 still praise the redness correction.
Is this the right choice for your routine?
Never tried the original: the new formula; 56% of reviewers who don't say they used the original say it fixes redness. Loved the original: get its travel size.
You loved the original: all 29 new-formula reviewers who say they used it say the new one is worse, and 15% describe an unpleasant smell.
We separate brand claims from customer experiences. We check shopping links and disclose when a purchase may earn us a commission.
OUR SOURCES & HOW WE REVIEW
What we checked.
See where the information comes from and how we reached our take. Brand claims, customer experiences, and our interpretation are identified separately.
- Amazon — Dr.Jart+ Cicapair Soothing Color Correcting Treatment SPF 30, New Formula (1.85 fl oz) (paid link). Checked October 20, 2026 with a US delivery address: title, bullets, style options, seller (Amazon.com), product group. No Amazon reviews or ratings read or used; no price recorded.
- Amazon — Dr.Jart+ Cicapair Color Correcting Treatment SPF 30, Original Formula (0.5 fl oz travel size) (paid link). Checked October 20, 2026 with a US delivery address: title, bullets, style options, seller (Amazon.com), product group, availability. No Amazon reviews or ratings read or used; no price recorded.
- Sephora — Dr.Jart+ Cicapair Soothing Color Correcting Treatment SPF 30, product page. Checked October 20, 2026: sizes, description, ingredient list, directions.
- Sephora — customer reviews page for New formula. 114 reviews read on October 20, 2026 (every English review without Sephora's Incentivized flag, all star levels and sizes (Jun 25, 2025 to Oct 19, 2026); 774 of the 889 English reviews carry the flag and 1 is from a Sephora employee, all set aside). Patterns tallied by THE BEAUTY READ; no review text reproduced.
- Sephora — customer reviews page for Original formula. 210 reviews read on October 20, 2026 (the 210 newest English reviews without the Incentivized flag on the original Tiger Grass page, which Sephora no longer sells (Sep 17, 2024 to Jan 2, 2026); 21 flagged reviews in that window set aside). Patterns tallied by THE BEAUTY READ; no review text reproduced.
Retailer prices, review totals and product information can change. This article is not medical advice.
